Artificial intelligence researchers have called on Google to abandon a project developing AI for the military, warning that autonomous weapons directly contradict the firm’s famous ‘Don’t Be Evil’ motto.
The experts join more than 3,100 of Google’s own employees, who signed an opened letter last month protesting the company’s involvement in a controversial Pentagon program called Project Maven.
The partnership between the technology giant and the US Military involves using customised AI surveillance software to analyse data from drone footage in order to better recognise target objects, such as distinguishing between a human on the ground and a vehicle.
Around a dozen employees have reportedly resigned in protest at Googles refusal to cut ties with the US Military, each one citing ethical concerns to Gizmodo. Google did not respond to a request for comment from The Independent.
In their letter last month to Google CEO Sundar Pichai, the employees wrote: "We believe that Google should not be in the business of war... We cannot outsource the moral responsibility of our technologies to third parties."
The researchers warn that the military could ultimately remove human oversight from drone strikes entirely, if Google’s technology proves effective.
“As military commanders come to see the object recognition algorithms as reliable, it will be tempting to attenuate or even remove human review and oversight for these systems,” the letter states.
“If ethical action on the part of tech companies requires consideration of who might benefit from a technology and who might be harmed, then we can say with certainty that no topic deserves more sober reflection - no technology has higher stakes - than algorithms meant to target and kill at a distance and without public accountability.”
Other fears detailed in the letter include the possibility of Google integrating the personal data of its users with military surveillance data for the purpose of targeted killing.
The use of such data would violate the public trust that is fundamental to the operation of Google’s business and would put the lives and human rights of its users in jeopardy, according to the researchers.
"The responsibilities of global companies like Google must be commensurate with the transnational makeup of their users," the letter states.
"While Google regularly decides the future of technology without democratic public engagement, its entry into military technologies casts the problems of private control of information infrastructure into high relief."